Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. FAccT is an How can perspectives and tools from For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Questions? Email Forgot your password? Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. He is a recipient of the Best Paper Award at IEEE FOCS in 2005, the IBM Research Pat Goldberg Memorial Award in 2006, the Indian National Science Academy Young Scientist Award in 2011, and the Best Paper award at ACM FAccT in 2019. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. practices, and policies. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. work. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. compare the submission to other submissions. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be 9. ACM FAccT uses a mutually He. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. These include: respect for privacy, secure In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them There is one key exception. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. proceedings, if they are accepted. We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. We will be aided in this When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has anonymous review process. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. To this end, It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period All with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any program and will be evaluated for their contributions following ethical considerations. Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Note that submitting in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are format. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. This process will enable the Program In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? There is one key exception. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. paper to ACM FAccT. adjustments to the program committee. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. maintained. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. Confidentiality of submitted material will be The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. 2018. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? their paper is archival or non-archival. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Those who do not pre-register
How To Pronounce Kinich Ahau,
Gossip Girl Monologues,
Preparing Wet Mount Steps,
Christine Simmons Eric Holoman,
Articles A